Monday, March 15, 2010

Spring Conference Registration

Register here for the TSRT & ITART Spring Conference on e-books, April 23, 2010 at Bellevue University.

The preliminary schedule is:
8:30 Registration & welcome

9:00 NLA Presidential address by Scott Childers

9:15 eBooks overview by Michael Sauers, ITART chair

10:00 break

10:15 Circulating e-book readers at UNO: What we know...for now by Joyce Neujahr,

11:15 Vendor presentations

Noon lunch

1:15 1st breakout session

2:00 break

2:15 2nd breakout session

3:00 ITART & TSRT business meetings

Labels:

Thursday, May 1, 2008

Another TSRT Spring Meeting Report

The Spring Meeting out in Aurora, Nebraska, was pretty good this year. The overall topic was "Spelunking or Serendipity: Discovery in the Catalog."

Jeffrey Beal, in his keynote address, "Metadata: Promise and Practice," talked about the need for rich metadata to make online catalogs and other search interfaces work well. He addressed the ideas of "search fatigue" and "Google rage" and posited that we are nearing the point where users will demand better, more accurate search results, the key to which is good metadata. The growing popularity of faceted searching suggests the rising importance of building and maintaining solid metadata for an increasingly diverse body of resources. He compared the strengths and weaknesses of deterministic searching (exact match), stochastic searching (full-text), metatext searching (catalog records and other metadata), and metadata-enhanced stochastic searching (full-text searching using metadata for limits and facets). He suspects that Google's advanced search limits on language, file type, usage rights, etc. are likely metadata driven, but of course, Google's staff-mode, like their ranking algorithm, is a well-guarded trade secret. He finished off with an exploration of Gresham's Law.

Gresham's Law originated in the realm of coin collecting. If two coins have the same face value, but are minted with different metal content, people will hoard the coins with a higher metal value and spend the ones of lower value. Thus, as the "good money" disappears from circulation, the "bad money" becomes the only money. (Think of pennies. Pre-1982 copper pennies are beginning to grow scarce as people squirrel them away in jars, while post-1982 copper-clad zinc pennies are deemed essentially valueless by collectors and remain in circulation.) Applied to other disciplines, the idea is that when something of lower quality becomes popular due to its low cost, the counterpart of higher quality increases in price until it is driven from the market or becomes accessible only to the elite. In this way, it appears that there is a present trend wherein cheap and abundant keyword searching is replacing expensive and accurate metadata searching.

But perhaps next-generation catalogs which rely on facets will reverse the trend, as facets require metadata or "metadata surrogates." (I'm not sure what "metadata surrogates" would be. Wouldn't any new descriptive encoding scheme be, by definition, metadata? Of course, eventually the word metadata will go out of vogue, and then we'll call it something else, even though it will be the same fundamental concept, much in the way that metadata itself is just the trendy name for cataloging.)

After the keynote came the first of the breakout sessions. Jan Boyer and I presented "Classifying Music CDs: Unearthing the Collection," showcasing our recently-completed music CD project. We had about nine people in attendance, and it seemed to be well received. No one threw vegetables at me, anyway. Some of the attendees had done similar projects with CDs or DVDs, and so I learned some new and cool things while talking to them after the session.

The majority of folks went to "Image Indexing: A Philosophical Approach" by Peter Konin. I have heard that this was a fascinating session. The subject material is certainly cool. I would imagine that cataloging images so they could be indexed and searched effectively with keywords would be very challenging, not to mention fun.

After the first breakout session, we had the TSRT business meeting, followed by lunch. Then we had the second breakout session. Jim Shaw presented "Broken URLs and Access to Content via the Catalog." I am sure he did an awesome job, but I attended "Connecting Print Titles with Their Electronic Alter Egos in the Catalog: Analysis and Full Disclosure" by Judith Wolfe, Dana Boden, and Joan Konecky of UNL. I figured, I need to learn all I can about electronic resources and about serials. They presented a project they did to find and correct various searching problems and disjoints between their catalog records. Sometimes the record for a print title would make it appear that it had ceased, and there would be no link or direction of any kind toward the electronic record that superseded it. They had a fairly diverse range of problems they encountered, from simple missing URLs to garbled, misleading records.

The majority of attendees, picked the third option for the afternoon session, Sue Ann Gardner's "LibraryThing and You: One Face of the Future of Catalogs and Cataloging." By all accounts, this was an excellent session. I would have loved to attend that one, as well as Jim's presentation, however the nature of breakout sessions is that sometimes you have to choose and bypass something else of interest. How sad. Everything on the program looked interesting.

Overall, it was a good and worthwhile meeting, even with the high winds whipping the cars all over the interstate on the way to and from Aurora.

Labels:

Friday, April 25, 2008

TSRT Spring Meeting

What a good conference!! I have a lot of new ideas to take back to work (like barcoding DVD's inside to force people to check for a disc at CKI and CKO). Like it's ok to have teachable moments at the catalog rather than dumbing it down (or googling it up, whichever). Like there are a lot of us out there struggling with the aboutness and itness of things and how to explain that to non-librarians let alone make it useful to them. Like Gresham's Law and precision and recall, each of which will come in very handy when trying to explain to the PTB why libraries matter and what what catalogers do matters...

Just getting home after a side-trip to see my mom & brother. If you've never been to Aurora's Leadership Center, and the opportunity arises - go see the place. Stay the night - preferably when the weather is nice enough to explore the grounds. Nice facility, comfy bed, great wireless in the main facility. Only drawback - no Dr Pepper products. If you're a Pepsi drinker, you've got it made in the shade...

And yes, Deirdre, I really WILL blog about the dangerous ideas session from PLA soon :)
Laura

Labels:

Friday, June 1, 2007

Spring Conference Review

To me, a conference or workshop is successful if I have learned something new, have been inspired, or have been introduced to tools I could utilize to perform my job better. Since Angela Kroeger’s posted a fantastic, thorough review below, especially on the keynote address, I will focus on specific aspects of sessions I attended that fulfilled my requirements. To me, they were successful in the following ways:
Through a glass darkly: Divining the “Next Generation Catalog” - Drawing on his vast experience with library databases as a vendor and as a systems librarian, speaker Mark Andrews offered fresh insight into the advantages and disadvantages of open- source ILS systems. Since library systems should be chosen based on user needs, Mark warned us that “free” open source systems are not really free – some do not have acquisition and serial modules and some can or cannot be tweaked to fit system needs. A “next generation catalog” is one that goes beyond being an index of information – instead it should be a dynamic, efficient process for the end user. Mark provided valuable insight into the features and shortcomings of Koha, PHPmylibrary, OpenBiblio, Evergreen, Solr, and other open-source systems; this input contributes toward making an informed decisions about these much-talked ILS alternatives.

The Next Generation Depository Library: Addressing Public Access to Government Publications in the Electronic Era addressed the issues surrounding selection of government documents, the availability of online access to government publications vs. downloading records, and the maintenance required when adding internet links to catalog records (validity and stability of direct internet links). What I learned from presenter James Shaw about the latter issue was the advantage of choosing links that utilize PURL, a service that attempts to check broken links for you. One significant resource that reduces the amount of time searching for and cataloging new government documents and points us to e-docs alert lists is the Nebraska Library Commission’s State Documents page. As a new librarian, new to Nebraska, and new to conferences, I returned from this conference eager to apply the concepts and tools I learned!

Labels: